Head-to-Head Comparison

Fish Audio vs OpenVoice

Compare Fish Audio and OpenVoice side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

F

Fish Audio

4.1/5
open-source

Fast, open-source voice synthesis with real-time cloning capabilities.

O

OpenVoice

4.1/5
open-source

Open-source instant voice cloning with cross-lingual capabilities.

Feature Comparison

FeatureFish AudioOpenVoice
Rating
4.1/54.1/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
8+6+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

Fish Audio

Pros

  • • Excellent open-source model
  • • Fast inference speed
  • • Good voice cloning quality
  • • Active development
  • • Community-driven

Cons

  • • Newer platform, less mature
  • • Limited documentation
  • • Smaller community than alternatives

OpenVoice

Pros

  • • Instant voice cloning
  • • Cross-lingual capabilities
  • • Separate style control
  • • MIT licensed
  • • Active community

Cons

  • • Requires technical setup
  • • Quality varies by use case
  • • GPU requirements

Other Comparisons

Fish Audio vs Coqui
Fish Audio vs Bark (Suno)
Fish Audio vs Dia (Nari Labs)

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.