Head-to-Head Comparison

Fish Audio vs Bark (Suno)

Compare Fish Audio and Bark (Suno) side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

F

Fish Audio

4.1/5
open-source

Fast, open-source voice synthesis with real-time cloning capabilities.

B

Bark (Suno)

4/5
open-source

Open-source text-to-audio model that generates speech, music, and sound effects.

Feature Comparison

FeatureFish AudioBark (Suno)
Rating
4.1/54/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
8+13+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

Fish Audio

Pros

  • • Excellent open-source model
  • • Fast inference speed
  • • Good voice cloning quality
  • • Active development
  • • Community-driven

Cons

  • • Newer platform, less mature
  • • Limited documentation
  • • Smaller community than alternatives

Bark (Suno)

Pros

  • • Completely free and open-source
  • • Can generate music and sounds
  • • Unique emotional capabilities
  • • Active community
  • • No API restrictions

Cons

  • • Requires significant GPU resources
  • • Inconsistent voice quality
  • • No commercial support
  • • Can be slow without optimization

Other Comparisons

Fish Audio vs Coqui
Fish Audio vs OpenVoice
Fish Audio vs Dia (Nari Labs)

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.