Head-to-Head Comparison

Fish Audio vs Coqui

Compare Fish Audio and Coqui side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

F

Fish Audio

4.1/5
open-source

Fast, open-source voice synthesis with real-time cloning capabilities.

C

Coqui

4.2/5
open-source

Open-source TTS with XTTS voice cloning from seconds of audio.

Feature Comparison

FeatureFish AudioCoqui
Rating
4.1/54.2/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
8+17+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

Fish Audio

Pros

  • • Excellent open-source model
  • • Fast inference speed
  • • Good voice cloning quality
  • • Active development
  • • Community-driven

Cons

  • • Newer platform, less mature
  • • Limited documentation
  • • Smaller community than alternatives

Coqui

Pros

  • • Fully open-source option
  • • Excellent voice cloning from minimal audio
  • • Active development community
  • • Self-hosting capabilities
  • • No vendor lock-in

Cons

  • • Requires technical expertise to self-host
  • • Less polished than commercial alternatives
  • • Limited commercial support

Other Comparisons

Fish Audio vs Bark (Suno)
Fish Audio vs OpenVoice
Fish Audio vs Dia (Nari Labs)

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.