Head-to-Head Comparison

Bark (Suno) vs OpenVoice

Compare Bark (Suno) and OpenVoice side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

B

Bark (Suno)

4/5
open-source

Open-source text-to-audio model that generates speech, music, and sound effects.

O

OpenVoice

4.1/5
open-source

Open-source instant voice cloning with cross-lingual capabilities.

Feature Comparison

FeatureBark (Suno)OpenVoice
Rating
4/54.1/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
13+6+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

Bark (Suno)

Pros

  • • Completely free and open-source
  • • Can generate music and sounds
  • • Unique emotional capabilities
  • • Active community
  • • No API restrictions

Cons

  • • Requires significant GPU resources
  • • Inconsistent voice quality
  • • No commercial support
  • • Can be slow without optimization

OpenVoice

Pros

  • • Instant voice cloning
  • • Cross-lingual capabilities
  • • Separate style control
  • • MIT licensed
  • • Active community

Cons

  • • Requires technical setup
  • • Quality varies by use case
  • • GPU requirements

Other Comparisons

Bark (Suno) vs Coqui
Bark (Suno) vs Fish Audio

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.