Head-to-Head Comparison

Bark (Suno) vs Coqui

Compare Bark (Suno) and Coqui side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

B

Bark (Suno)

4/5
open-source

Open-source text-to-audio model that generates speech, music, and sound effects.

C

Coqui

4.2/5
open-source

Open-source TTS with XTTS voice cloning from seconds of audio.

Feature Comparison

FeatureBark (Suno)Coqui
Rating
4/54.2/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
13+17+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

Bark (Suno)

Pros

  • • Completely free and open-source
  • • Can generate music and sounds
  • • Unique emotional capabilities
  • • Active community
  • • No API restrictions

Cons

  • • Requires significant GPU resources
  • • Inconsistent voice quality
  • • No commercial support
  • • Can be slow without optimization

Coqui

Pros

  • • Fully open-source option
  • • Excellent voice cloning from minimal audio
  • • Active development community
  • • Self-hosting capabilities
  • • No vendor lock-in

Cons

  • • Requires technical expertise to self-host
  • • Less polished than commercial alternatives
  • • Limited commercial support

Other Comparisons

Bark (Suno) vs OpenVoice
Bark (Suno) vs Fish Audio

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.