Head-to-Head Comparison

OpenVoice vs Coqui

Compare OpenVoice and Coqui side by side. See which text-to-speech platform is better for your needs in 2025.

O

OpenVoice

4.1/5
open-source

Open-source instant voice cloning with cross-lingual capabilities.

C

Coqui

4.2/5
open-source

Open-source TTS with XTTS voice cloning from seconds of audio.

Feature Comparison

FeatureOpenVoiceCoqui
Rating
4.1/54.2/5
Starting Price
Free tier availableFree tier available
Languages
6+17+
Voice Cloning
API Available
Free Tier
Enterprise Plan

Pros & Cons

OpenVoice

Pros

  • • Instant voice cloning
  • • Cross-lingual capabilities
  • • Separate style control
  • • MIT licensed
  • • Active community

Cons

  • • Requires technical setup
  • • Quality varies by use case
  • • GPU requirements

Coqui

Pros

  • • Fully open-source option
  • • Excellent voice cloning from minimal audio
  • • Active development community
  • • Self-hosting capabilities
  • • No vendor lock-in

Cons

  • • Requires technical expertise to self-host
  • • Less polished than commercial alternatives
  • • Limited commercial support

Other Comparisons

OpenVoice vs Bark (Suno)
OpenVoice vs Fish Audio
OpenVoice vs ElevenLabs

Still Not Sure?

Try Speechgen free and compare voice quality yourself. No credit card required.